Leadership

The Four Goals of Affirmative Action

Affirmative-action policies may aim to address documented discrimination, remove barriers, broaden opportunity, and monitor whether equal-opportunity systems work.

Goals associated with affirmative action

There is no universal set of four goals. Depending on the jurisdiction and program, affirmative-action measures may seek to address documented discrimination, remove unnecessary barriers, broaden outreach and opportunity, and monitor whether selection or advancement systems produce lawful and equitable access.

Current-law warning: Requirements and permitted practices vary and have changed materially. In the United States, Executive Order 11246 was revoked in 2025, while separate obligations concerning protected veterans and people with disabilities remain for covered federal contractors. The EEOC also voted in June 2026 to rescind older affirmative-action interpretive guidance. Consult current official guidance and qualified counsel before designing employment policy. See the U.S. Department of Labor OFCCP and the 2026 EEOC notice.

These are the four main goals of affirmative action:

  • To bridge inequalities and increase access to education and employment. Affirmative action measures have been used extensively to try and bridge inequalities in both education and employment. In the United States, for example, affirmative action policies were implemented in an attempt to increase the number of minority groups attending institutions of higher education, as well as to increase the number of women in the workforce.
  • To promote diversity. One of the main goals of affirmative action is to promote diversity in both education and the workplace. By increasing the number of underrepresented groups in these areas, it is hoped that a more diverse range of perspectives and experiences can be brought to bear on the issues faced by society.
  • To redress past harms, wrongs, or hindrances. Another key goal of affirmative action is to redress past harms, wrongs, or hindrances that have been inflicted upon certain groups. This includes addressing the historical mistreatment of certain groups, as well as addressing the present-day effects of this mistreatment.
  • To achieve a more just and equitable society. Ultimately, the goal of affirmative action is to achieve a more just and equitable society. By increasing access to education and employment for groups that have been historically marginalized, it is hoped that society as a whole can benefit from the greater inclusion of these groups.

Let’s get into the details.

What are some specific examples of affirmative action policies?

There are many specific examples of affirmative action policies, but here are a few of the most common:

  • Outreach campaign. Organizations may launch marketing or advertising campaigns specifically aimed at groups that are underrepresented in their workforce. For example, a company may place ads in publications that target minority groups or host job fairs in areas with high concentrations of minority residents.
  • Targeted recruiting. Rather than simply posting job openings and waiting for applications to come in, organizations may actively seek out qualified candidates from groups that are underrepresented in their workforce. This can involve working with community groups, sending recruiters to target schools or organizations, or attending job fairs and career fairs that focus on diversity.
  • Employee and leadership development. Organizations may invest in programs to help employees from underrepresented groups develop their skills and advance their careers. This can include things like mentorship programs, special training courses, and leadership development programs.
  • Employee support programs. Organizations may also implement programs to support employees from underrepresented groups, such as flexible work arrangements, childcare assistance, and health and wellness programs.

Negative consequences of affirmative action policies

There can be negative consequences associated with affirmative action policies.

One potentially negative consequence is that employers may feel pressure to hire qualified applicants from underrepresented groups, even if those applicants are not the best fit for the job. This can lead to a situation in which people are hired not because they are the most qualified, but simply because they are members of a certain group.

Another potential negative consequence is that white men may feel that they are being unfairly discriminated against. This is because, in some cases, affirmative action policies may result in the hiring of black employees over white employees, even if the white employees might be sometimes more qualified. This can create tension and resentment among employees, and may ultimately lead to a decline in productivity.

Alternative approaches to addressing inequality

There are a variety of alternative approaches to addressing inequality, and which approach is best depends on the specific situation. Some approaches include:

  • Making sure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed, regardless of race or gender. This can be done through things like affirmative action programs, which focus on giving everyone a fair chance to succeed.
  • Providing support and resources to marginalized groups. This can be done through things like financial aid, mentorship programs, and targeted outreach.
  • Creating policies and regulations that are fair and inclusive. This can be done through things like anti-discrimination laws, equal pay laws, and other laws and regulations that promote equality.
  • Educating people about the issue of inequality. This can be done through things like awareness campaigns, educational materials, and public speaking engagements.
Keep learning

Ten useful ideas. Five minutes. Every Friday.

Get ten snackable takeaways from the best leadership ideas we find each week, plus something practical to try at work.